Summary: Intro | Measuring the importance of gossip | Too good to be true | Arbitrary measures produce arbitrary results | tl;dr
Disclaimer: The probability computation of the article is a recap of a talk delivered by Professor Mark Whitehorn at the University of Dundee in 2015, and at PASS Business Analytics Conference in San Jose, CA in 2014. Opinions expressed are my own.
Aren’t we post-NPS hype yet? Such was my thinking until a random article came up on my feed: as one of its core objectives, a tech giant was planning to improve its Net Promoter Score by 2020. A quick internet search told me there are some companies very excited about increasing their NPS. Google Trends suggests the Net Promoter methodology is on the steady growth rate since 2004; a mortal blow to my presumption. There is something problematic about the Net Promoter methodology that I’d like to talk about: on one hand an indicator of an outstanding business delivery, on the other a possibly dangerous framework for workforce assessment. This article decomposes the NPS algorithm, reviews its criticism, and tests its validity from the probability perspective. I have based the scenario and the probability computation on an excellent talk delivered by professor Mark Whitehorn. If you happen to be a manager, a person whose performance is scored with NPS, you are into probability computations, or simply you like debunking managerial fads then this is a tale for you.
Continue reading “Taking down the NPS Score: KO by Probability”
I will be at Oracle Code conference on the 6th of June in Brussels, redefining fun with Python on Oracle database. The idea is to live demo working with tables, handling JSON files, (new) spatial data queries, data visualisation, and a couple of good practices of database application development with Python.
There will be snakes, ridiculous maps, and misbehaving queries. Come if you’re in town, it’s gonna be #phun
Some statistics for the aperitif:
Data scientists, according to interviews and expert estimates, spend from 50 percent to 80 percent of their time mired in this more mundane labor of collecting and preparing unruly digital data, before it can be explored for useful nuggets. New York Times, 2014. No source for the statistics.
Analysts will still spend up to 80% of their time just trying to create the data set to draw insights. Forrester, 2015. No source for the statistics.
Since the popular emergence of data science as a field, its practitioners have asserted that 80% of the work involved is acquiring and preparing data. Harvard Business Review, reprinting the statistic from Forbes in 2016. Forbes cites a “survey of about 80 data scientists was conducted for the second year in a row by CrowdFlower.”
Continue reading “Why is data preparation so hard and are we getting worse at it?”
Summary: Intro | A case of tl;dr | Where was the graph police? | A quick fix
This is a short story about a graph that could have been done better and an article that has gone awry. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
(OECD), one of the most powerful research bodies there is, has published an excellent report on the influence of robotics on the job market: conclusion of which was misinterpreted in a Polish influential newspaper, Krytyka Polityczna, and in other media. In this post I will analyze both the article and the report, to then theorize on what has gone wrong and who (or what) is to blame.
Today’s “from scratch” example with D3 is a must-have element of any data visualisation portfolio: a line chart. Line charts are great of visualizing changes in data over time. Just as in the previous posts in the series, my visualisation is a variation of a piece of code I found on the web. I started with a basic template created by Mike Bostock and then re-worked some of its elements to boost its usability & readability. As with the previous examples, all code can be downloaded, reused, adjusted, and it scales up and down to include extra data series or to remove one.
Continue reading “Getting Philosophical About a Line Chart. Data Visualisation from Scratch P.3”